All Posts By

Ned Lenhart

Illionis Offers Tax Amnesty

By | Amnesty Programs

The Illinois Department of Revenue announced this week that is was offering a tax amnesty from October 1 to November 30 2010 for taxpayers who owe tax from June 30, 2002 to July 1, 2009.  This is the second amnesty program Illinois has had this decade.  Its last one was in 2003.

Under the program, taxpayers will get abatement of penalty and interest.  If the amnesty eligible liabilities are not paid during the amnesty period, a penalty at 200% of the normal penalty could be imposed.  Taxpayers who forgo amnesty will pay a hefty price if they are audited and the liability is determined.  If your company files in Illinois or believes it should be filing in Illinois, this amnesty program may be a very worthwhile effort for you to participate in.

Also, Kansas will have an amnesty program from September 1 until October 15 and Maine will have an amnesty program from September 1 until November 30

Ned Lenhart
Illinois Amnesty Program

Should States Limit Refund Period to Save Revenue?

By | Sales Tax, Uncategorized

There is discussion within the Streamlined Sales Tax Program to develop a uniform sales tax refund period.  Some discussion is to make this a 1 year look back.  Most states allow the refund period to be the same as the assessment period which is 3 years.  The states are well within their right to limit the refund period under their soverign ammuity laws.  Technically, there is no requirement that states allow for refunds at all, however that would not set well with the public.

Limiting the look back to 1 year could have some uninteneded consquences.  First, it may flood the system with refunds-some legitimate and some not.  If you know that you only have a 1 year look back, you may only have time to throw everything into the refund claim and then sort it out later.  This could back up the system.

The other consequence would be a decline in current revenue collections if businesses adopt a very conservative approach to what is taxable and what is not.  Companies would be more aggressive at claiming exemptions or flat out not paying use tax on purchases.  If they know they can’t get a refund, why pay in the tax in the first place. 

Neither alternative is good, but I believe they could be real possibilties.

Ned Lenhart
President
Sales Tax Refunds

Why so Many Sales Tax Exemptions?

By | Legislative, Retail

A common theme during this year’s legislative session was to take a critical look at the list of sales tax exemptions that state have on their books.  There is no doubt that the number of exemptions has grown slowly over the past 30 years.  There is also little doubt that some exemptions may have outlived their intended purposes.  I recently looked at the Georgia sales tax exemptions and notices some very odd categories of products as being exempt from sales tax. I”m sure there was a reason for them at some point, but once on the books these are mostly considered to be sacred cows.  In Georgia and in other states, even these sacred cows are being examined.  As I’ve looked at the Georgia exemptions, I can put them into 4 basic categories.  Below is a brief overview of why certain exemptions may be needed and why some may be ready to be removed from the books.

1. Avoid duplicate taxation: Sales tax is due on each sales transaction unless the transaction is statutorily exempt.  One exemption that makes this system work well is the “sale for resale” exemption.  Without this exemption goods could and would be taxed at each stage throughout the sales process.  This would have a tax cascading affect and would greatly increase the cost of products.  To avoid this issue, every state allows products that are intended to be resold to be purchased without sales tax.

In a similar vein, the exemption for goods shipped outside of the state for use also avoids double taxation (as well as some serious US Constitutional challenges).  If goods were taxed in the state of origin and then again in the destination state, there would be double taxation and in impediment on the Commerce Clause.

2. Stimulate and promote desired economic activities: Most states have exemptions form sales tax for machinery, equipment, and pollution control equipment.  Many states are also exempting various types of technology purchases.  The reason for having these exemptions is to promote the purchases of this equipment and to stimulate the growth of jobs in industries that use this equipment.  The issue with many of these types of exemptions is that they often times outlive their essential and intended purposes.  While it is certainly noble to save companies money who purchase repair parts for their manufacturing machinery, most companies are not going to uproot their manufacturing plant if a state removes this incentive.  Likewise, companies that have large technology facilities are likely going to spend the same amount of money each year to upgrade and maintain these facilities with or without the existence of a sales tax exemption.

3. Avoid regressive nature of sales tax: Sales tax is an equal opportunity tax. Regardless of income level, everyone pays the same tax rate.  For families with low incomes, the payment of sales tax on essentials can be very burdensome.  Exemptions for sales of food, medicine, health care products, and other special items are often supported to avoid folks with lower incomes from paying tax on what could be essential items.

4. Special interests: By far the category that may have the largest number of exemptions relates to the special interest category.  This includes sales to farmers, sales of church bells, sales by Girl Scouts, sales to historical associations, and the like.  I’m sure each of these was provided for a special purpose but my guess is that purpose was primarily to win votes in the next election.  I don’t like to pay sales tax anymore than the next guy, but at some point you can’t exempt everything.

Conclusion

Georgia and many other states have commissions that are focused on evaluating tax exemptions and proposing changes.  Many states put sunset provisions on exemptions that force legislatures to evaluate the necessity and effectiveness of these so called “tax expenditures”.   For many industry groups, their main claim to fame is the ability to keep certain sales tax exemptions on the books despite their real need.

Ned Lenhart
President
Sales Tax Exemptions

Missouri Adds Data Center Sales Tax Exemption

By | Legislative, Technology

In a move to attract and to retain data centers and other high-tech companies, the Missouri General Assembly just passed House Bill 2 in a Special Session.  This makes Missouri one of the few states that has this type of exemption.  From recall, i believe that NY, VA, WA and GA also have some type of data center exemption once certain limits are met.  This bill provides a very wide rage of sales tax exemptions for new and for expanded data centers.  Here a some of the bill’s highlights:

1. Applies to new or expanded data centers in Missouri after 8-28-10
2. New facilities must apply to department of economic development and receive conditional approval for exemption
3. New facilities must spend $5 million over a 36 month period to get exemption.  Once amount is spent, DOR will give refund.
4. Includes cost of equipment, building supplies, used to build or remodel the center
5. Applies to electrical and telecommunications cost
6. For expanded facilities, companies must spend $1 million more than the average spend for past 3 years (or available years if less than 3)
7. Must apply for conditional approval and get refund of tax once paid.

This sounds like a very attractive offer but the bill seems to lack clarity on a couple of points.

1. What about leased hardware?  How is that to be valued for purposes of meeting the investment test.
2. There is no real definition of the terms “machinery, equipment and computers” so that will need to be clarified in regulation.
3. There is no mention of software to run the equipment.  I’m hopeful that is exempt as well as maintenance agreements

If you are planning any type of data center investment you may want to consider Missouri.  If you already have a data center in the state, this may be a good way to get some savings for future investment.

Ned Lenhart
President
Missouri Exemption for High-Tech Equipment

Georgia DOR Forces Retailer To Close over Sales Tax

By | Retail

The Rexall Grill of Duluth Georgia was forced to close its doors recently over a $500,000 sales tax liability (tax interest, penalty).  According to the news article, the tax was due for the period January 2004 to October 2009.  That’s over 5.5 years of delinquent sales tax.  The restaurant had been open since 1982.  This story is sad for two reasons.

1.  It took the Georgia DOR 5.5 years to contact a business that had not paid its taxes.  I am not at all surprised by this.  I’ve had dealings with several businesses over the years who have fallen 3, 4, 5 and 6 years behind in paying sales tax and the DOR had never contacted them once. Not a call not a letter.  In many cases, such as the Rexall Grill, I’m assuming that the tax was collected from customers and not paid. Georgia taxpayers deserve better administration of the sales tax.  It should not take the DOR 4 years to contact someone who owes sales tax.

2. Unfortunately, this situation is not that unusual.  This one just made the paper because the restaurant was popular.  Situations like this usually arise when a taxpayer gets one or two months behind.  At that point, they start to panic and don’t know what to do.  They know it will be bad they become paralyzed.  More months go by and months turn into years.  At this point, its too late to just pay the tax and they don’t know what to do.  They are on a collision course with disaster.  Someone should have intervened on behalf of this owner early on in the situation.  Here accountant or someone should have asked some basic questions or wondered why there were no payments for sales taxes being made.

There are hundreds maybe thousands of businesses like this in Georgia and in every state.  Small problems that can be corrected early are allowed to grow and create a financial catastrophe for the business and the owner.

Ned Lenhart
President
Georgia Tax Liability closes business

Oklahoma Retailer Compliance Initiative–Best Deal of the Year

By | Amnesty Programs

Oklahoma House Bill 2359, if signed by the Governor, could provide one of the best deals of the year to resolve unpaid use tax due the state.  This applies both to  retailers and to consumers.

For retailers, there will be a total forgiveness of any use tax that you may owe the state so long as you come forward and register under the new Retailer Compliance Initiative.  This will run from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011. You have to do this before you get audited and you must remain registered for at least 36 months after registration.  This program is similar to what the SSTP states did with their amnesty.  The state will even waive their registration fee for companies that register under this program.

For consumers who owe Oklahoma use tax, the state is limiting the look back to 12 months and is waiving the penalties and the interest related to the tax that is paid.  The consumer cannot be under audit and cannot have been contacted by the state.

These are very good opportunities for taxpayers who owe Oklahoma tax.  The Governor is expected to sign the bill which will become effective July 1, 2010.

Ned Lenhart
Oklahoma Amnesty

New Sales Tax Rate for Kansas July 1

By | Legislative, Retail

The Kansas state level sales tax rate is increasing from 5.3%  to 6.3% effective July 1, 2010.  This is almost a 19% increase in the sales tax rate over the previous 5.3%.

The Department has issued some instructions for companies that may be cash basis taxpayers or have service contracts that cover periods under the 5.3% tax rate.  To avoid companies remitting more sales tax than they collect from customers the Kansas DOR has issued instructions on how companies can adjust their sales tax returns to ensure that only the amount of tax collected is remitted.  State law does not allow for more than one return to be filed for any taxpayer, so if a company properly collected tax at 5.3% and at 6.3% the company will need to use a factor to reduce the taxable sales so that the tax calculated at 6.3% is equal to the tax collected at 5.3%.  This downward adjustment is shown on Part II Line N “other allowable deductions”.

Ned Lenhart
President
Kansas Tax Rate

Huge Sales Tax Overpayment-How did this get through?

By | Tax Audit

A company recently overpaid its New York state and Suffolk County New York sales tax in one month by $10,000,000!!!!  How do you do this?

Apparently company paid over $10 million in use tax when it should have only paid $1,000.  The company reported out- of-state purchases of $116,000,000 which was taxed at 8.625% for a total tax of $10,005,000.   The county is having to refund over $5 million and the State is having to refund over $4.6 million.

What type of company would just pay $10 million in tax without some deeper investigation?  Who would prepare a sales tax return and not understand that this is not right?

Ned Lenhart
President
New York Tax Overpayment

Corporate Officer Escapes Liability-This Time!!

By | Tax Audit

Most states have a very powerful tool to collect unpaid transaction and withholding taxes.  It’s called “officer liability”.  The statutes vary widely between the states.  Regardless of how they may apply, the end game is the same…hold one or more officers of the organization personally liable for unpaid taxes.  If they can’t pay, put a lien on their property and force them to a judicial sale to satisfy the tax.

Virginia recently issued a letter ruling that determined that the CEO of the company was not personally liable for unpaid use tax and some withholding tax because he didn’t have day to day control of these activities and didn’t have any actual knowledge that the taxes were not getting paid.  Even though his name was on the account as a responsible party, the company used a check writing machine to apply his signature to the checks and he didn’t pay any attention to what was being paid and what was not being paid. In some states, this fact pattern would not have been beneficial to the CEO.

The application of officer liability rules vary by state.  Some states apply this only to taxes that are collected but not remitted.  Some states apply this to all taxes, whether collected or not.  Some states apply the standard to an “responsible party” whether they are an officer or not.  You get the idea. There is no uniform standard as to when this rule will apply.  The part that is uniform, is that states have the ability to enforce these provisions when they need to and are not afraid to do so.

If your company has unpaid sales or use tax and your officers are not adequately protected or at least informed of this potential liability, then there could be serious issues to deal with if taxes are not being paid.

Ned Lenhart
President
Voluntary Disclosure Negotiations

Unregistred Business Identification-Georgia’s New Approach

By | Sales Tax, Uncategorized

Georgia House Bill 1093 was signed into law recently.  This bill is in response to some legislators’ belief that tens of millions of tax dollars are going uncollected in Georgia because of unregistered state domiciled businesses.  In an effort to cooperate with the local governments, the state is now requiring that each city and county that has a local business tax ordinance to gather and submit additional information to the Georgia Department of Revenue.  The goal is to identify businesses that are registered for business tax that should also be registered for collection and remittance of sales tax.

During the hearings, someone legislators speculated that over $300 million of sales tax was going uncollected because of unregistered local businesses and that if the counties and cities would help identify these law breakers, there would be a windfall for them also.  If you do the math, at 7% sales tax rate that is over $4 billion in untaxed but taxable revenue.  I have serious doubts that this is a legitimate number.

The bill requires that the municipalities gather the following information from taxpayers:

1. Name and address
2. Sales tax ID if one exists and if the business is required to have an ID

The municipality then will submit this information to the Georgia DOR.  That’s it.

The bill does not require any action on the part of the DOR.  There is no call to action once the data arrives or any mention as to what follow up steps the state or the municipality will take.  There is no matching required to take place to ensure that the unregistered businesses actually register.  Nothing.

This bill also dodges the biggest problem completely.  It assumes that the business knows whether it is required to have a sales tax ID.  If the business is required to have an ID but does not know it has such a responsibilty, what good is this program?

Ned Lenhart
President of Sales Tax Advisors of Georgia
Georgia Tax Enforcement